← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhCONT/162/2018disposed off

Tarachand Awasthi v. Smt. Madhulika Singh

2019-08-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CONT No. 162 of 2018

1. Tarachand Awasthi S/o Ganpat Lal Aged About 51 Years Working As Panchayat Karmi, Dispatch Section At Nagar Panchayat Malhar, Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

2. Rameshwar Prasad Soni S/o Bullu Ram Aged About 56 Years Working As Panchayat Karmi (Education, Health Department) At Nagar Panchayat Malhar, Tahsil Masturi, Police Station Masturi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

3. Vishal Chouhan S/o Shri Malik Ram Aged About 53 Years Working As Panchayat Karmi, Water Supply Hand Pump, Electricity Department At Nagar Panchayat, At Nagar Panchayat Malhar, Tahsil Masturi, Police Station Masturi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. Smt. Madhulika Singh The Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat Malhar, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

2. Alarmelmangai D W/o Shri Anbalbgan P. Aged About 39 Years Director, Urban Administration And Development Department, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Rajesh Jaiswal S/o Shri R. P. Jaiswal Aged About 49 Years Joint Director, Urban Administration Devleopment, Vayapar Vihar, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents ___________________________________________________________________ For Petitioners :

Mr. Dharmesh Srivastava, Advocate For Respondent No.1 :

Mr. Rahul Tamaskar, Advocate For Respondents No. 2 & 3 :

Mr. Anoop Majumdar, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 01/08/2019 Heard.

1. Today, the present incumbent of the offices of Director, Urban Administration and Joint Director, Urban Administration both are present in the Court.

2. It is brought to the notice by this Court that the order passed by this Court has now been complied with by the present incumbent in the aforesaid offices.

3. Considering the aforesaid submission and subsequent development regarding compliance of the order of the Court and that the present incumbent of the offices were not concerned officer at the time when the order was passed or

during the period within which, order was required to be complied with, I am inclined to close the matter and discharge the rule.

4. The Rule is discharged. The contempt petition is closed. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Ravi