← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/501/2018disposed off

Dulaurin Bai v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-02-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. 501 of 2018

1. Dulaurin Bai D/o Shri Nankiram, Aged About 63 Years R/o Village Bhaiso, Tahsil Pamgarh, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

2. Raj Kumari D/o Late Shri Nankiram Aged About 58 Years R/o Village Bhaiso, Tahsil Pamgarh, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Public Works Department (B/R), Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Collector, Janjgir, District- Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : JanjgirChampa, Chhattisgarh

3. Land Acquisition Officer/ Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Pamgarh, District- Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ----Respondents Writ Petition (C) No. 505 of 2018 Devnarayan Choubey, S/o Shri Gaya Prasad Choubey, aged about 74 years, R/o Village Dongakohraund, Tahsi.l Pamgarh, Civil and Revenue District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Public Works Department (B/R), Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Collector, Janjgir, District- Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : JanjgirChampa, Chhattisgarh

3. Land Acquisition Officer/ Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Pamgarh, District- Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ----Respondents

For Petitioners :

Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate.

For Respondents :

Mr. B. Gopa Kumar, Dy. Advocate General.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 26/02/18 1.

Since common question of law and fact is involved in these two writ petitions, they are heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.

2.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that on the petitioners' land, road is being constructed by the respondent authorities, but the compensation has not been paid to them.

3.

Learned counsel for the State would submit that existing road is being reconstructed and no widening is being made by the respondent authorities. 4.

I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and considered their rival submissions made herein above and also gone through the record with utmost circumspection.

5.

Be that as it may, the petitioners are at liberty to make representation to the Collector for grant of compensation, which shall be considered by the Collector strictly in accordance with law. If the measurement is required to be made, the same shall be made in presence of the petitioners and thereafter the Collector shall proceed in accordance with law after hearing the affected parties expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

6.

With the aforesaid observations, the writ petitions stand finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka