Budhdeshwar Prasad Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.1172 OF 2019

1. Budhdeshwar Prasad Sahu S/o Late Panch Ram Sahu Aged About 29 Years Working As Assistant Grade Iii ,at Govt Higher Secondary School Hasuwa, Block Kasdo ,district Baloda Bazar Bhapara Chhattisgarh.

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of School Education Mahnadi Bhawan ,mantralaya Naya Raipur Distrct Raipur Chhatisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director Directorate Of Police Intor Ducsan Indrawati Bhawan Atal Nagar Raipur New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. District Education Offifecer Education District Balodabazx District Baloda District Boladabazar, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

4. Block Education Officer Kasdol District Balada Bazar Bhathapara ., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

5. Cheif Executev Officer Zila Panagayt Balodabar Diistrct Balodgabzzar, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner :

Shri Govind Dewangan, Advocate.

For Respondent-State :

Shri Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 21.02.2019 1.

The only relief which the petitioner has sought for in this petition is for a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for confirmation of his service.

2.

According to counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner was appointed on compassionate basis vide order dated 20.07.2009 and that he has put in more than 9 years of service, however, till date he has not been confirmed. No reasons have been assigned as to why he has not been confirmed.

3.

Given the limited grievance that the petitioner has raised, this court is of the opinion that ends of justice would meet if the respondents

NO.3 & 4 are directed to look into the grievance of the petitioner and pass a suitable order so far as his confirmation is concerned. 4.

The petitioner is directed to approach the respondents No.3&4 by making a suitable representation in respect of his claim supported with all relevant documents that he has in his possession and, in turn, the respondents No.3&4 shall take a decision in the case of the petitioner as regards his confirmation at the earliest within a period of 60 days from the date of representation.

5.

It is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case so far as entitlement of the petitioner for confirmation is concerned.

6.

The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge inder