High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1064/2008disposed off

Prahlad Singh v. Hindusthan Steelworks Const.Ltd.Andanr.

2017-04-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1064 of 2008 • Prahlad Singh, aged about 57 years, S/o Shri Dhiran Das, P.No. 46659, Ex. Helper Of HSCL, R/o Sector -11, Khursipar, Near Guru Ghasidas Mandir, Zone-II, P.O. Bhilai, Distt. Durg (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Hindusthan Steelworks Construction Ltd., Through its Chairmancum-Managing Director, (A Govt. of India Undertaking), 5/1 Commisariat Road, Hastings, Kolkata-22

2. Hindusthan Steelworks Construction Ltd, Through Group General Manager Of Bhilai Unit, P.O. Bhilai, Distt. Durg (C.G.) ---- Respondent For Petitioner Mr. Uttam Pandey, Advocate For Respondents Mr. Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 19/4/2017

1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner's case is covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in Writ Appeal No.185 of 2007 (Hindustan Steelworks Construction Ltd. & another v. Smt. Kiran Sahu & others) decided on 3.2.2015 and, therefore, in light of above judgment, he may be permitted to make representation before the competent authority and the same may be directed to be decided within the specific time frame.

2. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents, would submit, on instructions, that the petitioner has already been paid the following amounts, which are part of his retiral dues. CPF Rs.187972.92 Gratuity Rs.66795/- Ex-Gratia Rs.149346/- Leave enchashment Rs.6531/- Back log salary Rs.9129/-

3. Be that as it may, if the petitioner files representation before the competent authority for redressal of his grievances, it is expected from the authority concerned to decide the same in the light of judgment of this Court in W.A. No.185/2007 decided on 3.2.2005 in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within period of three months from the date of receipt of representation.

4. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of.

Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Shyna