Anil Kumar Agrawal v. C.G. Rajya Krishi Vipnan Board And ANR.

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No.5259 of 2008 Anil Kumar Agrawal, S/o Shri Radheshyam Agrawal, aged about 37 years, through its proprietor, M/s Shyam Rice and Perboiled Unit No.2, Neora, Raipur (CG).

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. C.G. Rajya Krishi Vipnan Board, through Secretary, C.G. Rajya Krishi Vipnan Board, Raipur Division, Raipur (CG).

2. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Neora, Raipur through its Secretary, Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Neora, District Raipur (CG). --- Respondents For Petitioner : Dr. N.K. Shukla, Sr. Advocate with Mr.

Shailendra Shukla, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 07/12/2017 (1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner's application for grant of license has been rejected by the Secretary, Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Nevra under Section 32(3) of the Chhattisgarh Krishi Upaj Mandi Adhiniyam, 1972, which is unsustainable and bad in law.

(2) Since the petitioner's application for grant of license was rejected way back on 10.07.2008, therefore, the petitioner is at liberty to make fresh application after completing all the formalities before respondent No.2-Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Neora, Raipur in accordance with law. If such application is filed by the petitioner before respondent No.2, in that event respondent No.2 shall consider and decide the same strictly in accordance with law. In case, adverse order

is passed against the petitioner, then he is at liberty to approach to the competent court for redressal of his grievance. (3) With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-