← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/499/2018disposed off

Ambalika Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-02-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. 499 of 2018 Ambalika Sahu W/o Sunil Sahu, Aged About 36 Years, Resident Of Adarsh Nagar, Charoda, Post B.M.Y. Charoda, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Health And Family Welfare, Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Directorate Of Medical Education Raipur, Through Its Director, Old Nurses Hostel, D.K.S. Bhawan Parisar Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Directorate Of Medical Education Raipur, Through Its Course Director Dr. Jitendra Tiwari, Para Medical Course, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ----Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Jitendra Gupta, Advocate.

For Respondents :

Mr. Arun Sao, Dy. Advocate General.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 26/02/18 1.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has applied for grant of duplicate mark-sheet of O.T. Technician Course for the year 2001-02 which has been rejected on untenable grounds against which this writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner. 2.

On the other hand, learned counsel for respondent would submit that petitioner's application will be considered and mark-sheet will be granted by respondent No. 3 within a period of 30 days.

3.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties.

4.

Be that as it may, the respondent No. 3 - Directorate Of Medical Education, Raipur is directed to take cognizance of the petitioner's application for grant of duplicate mark-sheet of O.T. Technician Course for the year 2001-02 and decide the same expeditiously within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 5.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka