Girish Kumar Dewangan v. State Of Chhattisgarh,
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.
of 201 Girish Kumar Dewangan, son of Late Siyaram Dewangan, aged about 57 years, resident of Renugiri, Opposite HIG-110, Deen Dayal Upadhayay Nagar, Sector-1, Raipur, District Raipur, Chjhattisgarh, Occupation Accountant, Nagri Apuri Nigam Limited.
---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of Food and Civil Supplies, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)
2. Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, through its Managing Director, Hitwad Premises, Awanti Vihar Colony, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh
3. Chairman, Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Hitwad Premises, Awanti Vihar Colony, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh
4. Managing Director, Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Hitwad Premises, Awanti Vihar Colony, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh
5. District Manager, Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, District Officer Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioner:
Mr. R.S. Baghel, Advocate.
For State :
Mr. Ratan Pusty, Govt. Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 0 5 /0 3 /201 (1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner may be allowed to make representation against the order of suspension dated 18.02.2015 and for revocation of suspension in light of decision rendered by the Supreme Court in the matter of Ajay Kumar
Choudhary Vs. Union of India & others1 and the same may be directed to be decided expeditiously.
(2) Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable and accordinlgy the same is allowed.
(3) Be that as it may, if petitioner files representation before the competent authority within a period of 15 days from today for redressal of his grievances, it is directed to be decided by the authority concerned within a period of 45 days from its receipt. The petitioner is at liberty to file additional documents/ relevant documents in support of his case. (4) With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands finally disposed of.
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge D/- 2015 (7) SCC 291