Md. Rashid Haq v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 870 OF 2016 Md. Rashid Haq S/o Haji Fazlool Haq, Aged About 54 Years Occupation Subedar (M) Working Under The Office Of Superintendent Of Police (P.T.S.) Rajnandgaon, P.S. Kotwali, District Rajnandgaon, (Chhattigarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Home And Police Affairs, Secretariat, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, P.S. And Post Rakhi, District Raipur, (Chhattigarh) 2.

Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Civil Line, P.S. Civil Line, District Raipur, (Chhattigarh) 3.

Inspector General Of Police, Office Of The Inspector General Of Police Durg Range, Durg, (Chhattigarh) 4.

Additional Director General Of Police ( Training) Police Head Quarter, Civil Line, P.S. Civil Line, District Raipur, (Chhattigarh) 5.

Joint Director Of Division ( Funds Account And Pension), Durg, District Durg, (Chhattigarh) 6.

The Secretary, Finance Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattigarh) 7.

The Director ( Treasury, Audit And Accounts), Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattigarh) ----Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Badruddin Khan, Advocate For State :

Mr. S.P. Kale, Dy. Advocate General Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 29/04/2016 1.

Heard.

2.

At the outset, learned counsel for the parties would fairly submit that the issue involved in the present writ petition has already been decided by this Court in WP(S) No. 6698/2014

(Rammani Tripathi Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others) on 24.12.2014 and the present writ petition may also be disposed of in similar terms.

3.

Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order passed in WP(S) No.6698/2014. However, it is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondents would be at liberty to decide the representation strictly in accordance with law. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) JUDGE Tiwari