Ashwani Deshmukh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 1343 of 2019 Ashwani Deshmukh, D/o Shri Babban Rao Deshmukh, aged about 28 years, R/o Flat No.14, Chikal Thana MIDC, Saiban Society, Aurangabad, District Aurangabad Maharashtra. ---- Applicant

Versus

State of Chhattisgarh, through Station House Officer, Police Station Azad Chowk, Raipur, District Raipur (CG). ---- Non-applicant For Applicant : Mr. Ashish Surana, Advocate.

For Non-applicant : Ms. M. Asha, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board 08.03.2019 1.

This is first bail application under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. preferred by the applicant before this Court and no other bail application is pending before any other Court.

2.

Perused the case diary provided by the counsel for the State in connection with Crime No.25/2019 registered at Police Station Azad Chowk, Raipur, District Raipur for the offence punishable under Sections 4, 5 & 7 of Prevention of Immoral Traffic Act, 1956.

3.

Case of the prosecution, in brief is that on 20.01.2019, C.S.P. Nasar Siddiqui, Azad Chowk, Raipur received an information from informant that in the Hotel Recharge, the prostitution business was going on. Co-accused Jayesh Varu is working as a Manager in the said hotel. A person namely Manish Mishra is made as a Pointer. Three notes of denomination of Rs.500/-, numbers 11C3875797, 5SD320673 and 0AP039791 were given to the said pointer to give procurer. The said pointer went to the hotel and told to the coaccused Jayesh Varu to provide a girl in lieu of that, the said co-accused received an amount of Rs.1500/- from him. Pointer was talking with the girl, who is the applicant in the case in hand in Room No.206 of the said hotel. The police party raid the hotel and seized three notes of denomination of Rs.500/- bearing the same numbers from the said co-accused. 4.

Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has not committed any offence. She is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case, therefore, she may be released on bail. 5.

On the other hand, counsel for the State opposes the bail application, however, he submits that no criminal antecedent is reported against the applicant in police case diary.

6.

Looking to the above facts and circumstances of the case, the application is allowed. It is ordered that if the applicant furnishes one solvent surety for a sum of Rs.25,000/- along with one personal bond of the like sum to the satisfaction of the trial Court concerned, she be released on bail. 7.

Certified copy as per rules.

Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) JUDGE L/-