M/S. Shrishrimal Plantation Ltd. v. State Bank Of India And ORS.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Order Sheet WPC No. 584 of 2008
1. M/s. Shrishrimal Plantation Limited Company registered under the companies Act 1956 having its registered office at Ravi bhawan Jai Sthambh, Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. Shri Devi Chan Jain, aged adult Son Of Late Shri Maniklal Jain Managing Director Shri Shrimal Plantation Limited, Resident of 5, South Avenue Choubey Colony Raipur, Chhattisgarh
3. Shri Kamal Chand Jain, aged adult Son Of Late Shri Maniklal Jain Managing Director Shri Shrimal Plantation Limited, Resident Of 5, South Avenue Choubey Colony Raipur Chhattisgarh
4. Shri Shailendra Jain, aged adult Son Of Late Shri Swaroop Chand Jain Director Shri Shrimal Plantation Limited, Resident Of 5, South Avenue Choubey Colony Raipur Chhattisgarh
5. Shri Swaroop Chand Jain Son Of Late Shri Maniklal Jain, aged adult
6. Shri Loon Karan Jain Son Of Late Shri Maniklal Jain, aged adult
7. Shri Dhiraj Kumar Jain Son Of Late Shri Loon Karan Jain, aged adult
8. Smt. Vimla Devi Jain, w/o Shri Vimal Chand Jain, Aged adult
9. Shri Devi Chand Jain, Son Of Late Shri Maniklal Jain, Aged adult 10.Shri Kamal Chand Jain, Son Of Late Shri Maniklal Jain, Aged adult
11. Shri Shailendra Jain, son of Shri Swaroop Chand Jain, aged adult Applicants No. 5 to 11, resident of 5, South Avenue, Choubey Colony, Raipur Chhattisgarh 12.M/S Ganesh Twine Mills, a partnership firm having its office at Raipur through anyone of its partners namely Shri Swaroop Chand Jain Shri Loon Karan Jain, both son of Late Shri Maniklal Jain, Shri Dhiraj Kumar Jain son of Shri Loonkaran Jain, Smt. Vimla Devi Jain, wife of Shri Vimal Jain, Shri Devi Chand Jain, son of Late Shri Maniklal Jain, Shri Kamal Chand Jain, son of Late Maniklal Jain, Shri Shailendra Jain son of Shri Swaroop Chand Jain
(Cause title is as per recovery application) ---- Petitioners
Versus
State Bank Of India, A body Corporate constituted under the State Bank of India Act- 1955 having it's central office at Mumbai, a local Head office at Bhopal M.P. and an Industrial Finance Branch at amongst other places Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent 08/07/2019 Shri Amrito Das, Counsel for the Petitioner No.1. Shri B.D. Guru, Counsel for the Respondent.
Heard.
Learned counsel for the petitioner No.1 submits that the matter has been settled in between the parties. Therefore, this writ petition has become infructuous. In view of the above submission, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge Jyoti