Arun Kumar Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1261 of 2019
1. Arun Kumar Sahu S/o Pyare Lal Sahu, Aged About 48 Years, Working As Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Middle School Pandariya, Block Baloda Bazar, District Balodabazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh.
2. Naresh Lal Verma S/o Panchayat Verma, Aged About 50 Years, Working As Teacher (L.B.) and Posted At Govt. Middle School Bamhanpuri, Block Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh.
3. Kamlesh Prasad Sahu S/o Shri Sonauram Sahu, Aged About 51 Years, Working As Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Middle School Bamhanpuri, Block Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh.
4. Sunhar Lal Yadav S/o Bhajoram Yadav, Aged About 48 Years, Woriking As Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Middle School Karda, Block Baloda Bazar, District Balodabazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. ---Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2. Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
3. District Education Officer, Baloda Bazar, District Balodabazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh.
4. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Baloda Bazar, District Balodabazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh.
---Respondents For petitioners :
Shri U.P.Singh Sahu, Advocate.
For State :
Shri Rahul Mishra, Dy.G.A.
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 22/02/2019.
1.
The limited grievance of the petitioners is that they are entitled for the benefit of Kramonnati on completing 10 years of service which they have completed but they have not been given the same till date.
2.
Given the limited grievance raised, let both the petitioners make detailed representation in this regard to respondents 1 & 3 who in turn shall scrutinize the same and pass a suitable order in accordance with the rules governing the field of Kramonnati. It is expected that an appropriate order shall be passed within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of representation of the petitioners.
3.
With the aforesaid observation, both the writ petitions stand disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Sumit JUDGE