High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1392/2015disposed off

Virendra Jha v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS

2015-08-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No.1392 of 2015 • Virendra Jha, aged about 41 years, S/o Shri Jagannath Jha, posted as Patwari in Patwari Halka No.103/34, Tatibandh, P.S. Tatibandh, Tehsil Raipur, District Raipur (CG) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of Revenue & Disaster Management, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (CG)

2. Under Secretary, Department of Revenue & Disaster Management, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (CG)

3. Collector, Raipur, P.S. Civil Lines, Raipur (CG)

4. Sub Divisional Officer, Raipur, District Head Quarter, Raipur, P.S. Civil Lines, Raipur (CG) ---- Respondent For Petitioner : Shri Jitendra Pali, Advocate.

For Respondent/State : Shri Shashank Thakur, Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 26/08/2015

1. By this petition, the petitioner seeks to challenge the legality and validity of the order dated 15.7.2014 whereby he has been transferred from District Raipur to District Bastar.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the State would submit that the petitioner is continuing at the original place of posting for the last one year on

account of various interim orders granted by this Court. The State/respondents may be granted liberty to pass appropriate orders keeping in view public interest and administrative exigency. Learned counsel would further submit that the State/respondents shall not insist upon compliance of the impugned order dated 15.7.2014. It is accordingly ordered.

3. Since no effect could be given to the impugned order on account of aforesaid interim orders, it is not necessary to go into the legality and validity of the impugned order in the facts of the case.

4. In view of the above, according to learned counsel appearing for the State, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication at this stage.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Barve