Smt.Sunita Bai Bhoi v. Daya Bhai Khurshal Bhai Patel And ORS.

(2L) iN THE HGVBLE HIGH EOURT OF CHHATTISGW AT :

3mm wan PETITION N9". 6 kiia, OF 200$ PETITIGEER :

3mg; Sunti Bali Bhai, aged 57 yeaw',"

wife 0f Shri Chai't Lal Bhoi;' resident cf Katiyapara, Juna Bilaspur, tahsil & .

diatric-t Biiaspur ( Chhattisgarh )5;

VEwJ$ V RESPONDENTS g 1'."

Dayabhai Khushalbhai Pam}- Suryémukhi Bidi Bilaspur', through Sm'ti'g Usha Bai Patél', wife of late Shri I Oi Namndra Ehai Pa£el, msident of Jagmal J Chow; near Jalaram temple, Tikrapara Bilaspur, tahsil and di$trict Bklaspur;

( Chha'ttisg'arhh i3;

Appellate Authori'ty, under the x ,paymént of Graiuity Act, l972:;

and Deputy Labour Comiséioner;

Raipuli'c;

32g Ccntrolling Authority, under the wymen'h cf gratuity Ac'c', .L972g, Bilaspur (Chhattisgam)zg} .

jg?

wan PETITIm 'UNmER ARTIcLE 225?:27: 0F.

THE coNsTITggcw 0.3 mam,

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH BILASPUR WP No. 642 ofj003 '

'

.

Smt.Sunita BaiBhoi ---- Petitioner

Versus

- ---- Respondents Shri Ritesh Verma, counsel for the petitioner. 07/12/2015 Shri Aman Kesharwani.

counsel for the respondent No.1.

Heard.

,t Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the .

petition has become infructuous.

ln view of the above submission, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

SdlGoutam Bhaduri l l Judge W l.

l l '

l l