Santosh Kumar Kashyap v. The State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COUR? OF JUDICATUKE AT BILASPUE (CG)

S* P«HO«_0 7'7 OP 2002 BETWEEH Santosh Kuraar KashycSi Spn of Hoti I<al Kashya@__-^ aged aboufe 35 yeaxss oecupatioB Seccetary/ Paacliayat Karnu, r/o 'village iTaijaipur dlsfer.f.ct Jaajg.i.r Chanpa*;

PETITIONER &N D ^'

State o£ Cl'ihattisgarlit ThEough tfte secretars: Departaent of Panchayat Mantralay, D*K*s« Bullding, Sa.i.pur (CG).

^.,2^, The Coliector, Jaajglr ebsnpgl "^..••^^^^ ^'\.-''>^^3S'

CMef Executive offil.cer, Jaapad Pancbayat ^.••"^,'^pV- <TaijaipaE,S.lstrlct Jaajglr Cbanpa 4Si <^^r.

\u^--'

Bepatey Dlrector, Pancliayab aad Samaj Kalyan, Janjglr Champa, Districfc Saja.jgis Ciiaapa*i •^.^ , ^'A ..

' '^'

RBSPO^BBt'lTS ^--^ -.^\^ NRIT ipB;'F:I:TION BNOSR ABTZCI^S 226/227 OF CGNSTITU'TIOB. OF IBDI& SL.ilUl.

\\

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR WP No. 977 of 2002 1.

Santosh Kumar Kashyap -- Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Chhattisgarh and others -- Respondents For Petitioner - None.

For Respondents 1, 2 and 4 - Shri Neeraj Sharma, Deputy Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Chandra Bhushan Bajpai Order on Board 28-04-2017 ^:

1.

The petitioner is not represented when the matter is taken up for hearing.

2.

With this, this Coi.frfihas' noicifl'jgF ggtion but to dismiss thisWP for want of prosecution.

s'^'^WW^ 3.

Consequently, the inslaHfjWP|tSj'yismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Chandra Bhushan Bajpai'

Judge 1;!^ ii;l^..;

"'"""iii*