High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/707/2019dismissed

Biharilal Soni v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-02-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 707 of 2019 • Biharilal Soni, S/o Late Shri Khyali Ram Soni, Aged About 74 Years, Social Activist, R/o Darri Road, Korba District Korba Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development , Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Collector Korba District Korba Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh

3. The Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh

4. The Assistant Project Officer, MANREGA, Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh

5. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Kartala, District Korba, Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh

6. Ganga Singh Kanwar, Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Sarag Bundiya, Block Kartala, Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh

7. Gitendra Kumar Jaiswal, Secretary, Gram Panchayat Sarag Bundiya, Block Kartala, Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh

8. K. Anil Kumar, Technical Assistant, Janpad Panchayat Kartala, Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh

9. Anup Dubey Rojgar Sahayak Gram Panchayat Saragbundiya, Katrala Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 10.Programme Officer, Janpad Panchayat Kartala, Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent

For Petitioner Shri Ajay Barik, Advocate For Respondent-State Shri Sudeep Verma, Dy. GA Hon'ble Justice Mr. Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 26/02/2019 1.

In the present writ petition, the petitioner is not claiming any relief for his own benefit nor any of his fundamental rights or statutory rights have been violated by any of the respondent, therefore, the present petition is not maintainable.

The appropriate remedy for the petitioner lies in approaching the Chhattisgarh Lok Ayog bringing into its notice the irregularities or illegalities committed by the private respondent Nos.6 to 9. 3.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to move in the manner as indicated above.

Sd/- (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Judge Nirala