High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/493/2018disposed off

Sadan Lal Gupta v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-02-23Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 493 of 2018 Sadan Lal Gupta S/o Late Shri Balgovind, Aged About 80 Years R/o Main Road, Surajpur, Tahsil And District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Collector, Surajpur Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh

3. The Sub Divisional Magistrate Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh

4. Executive Engineer, Public Works Department (Nh Divn.) Nagar, Thana, Tahsil Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh

5. Superindent Of Police, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh

6. Station House Officer Police Station Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh

7. Ramu Agrawal S/o Late Triloki Agrawal Aged About 65 Years R/o Main Road, Surajpur, Tahsil And District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh

8. Raju Agrawal S/o Shri Shankar Agrawal Aged About 45 Years R/o Main Road, Surajpur, Tahsil And District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Sushil Dubey, Advocate.

For State : Shri Shashank Thakur, Govt. Advocate.

Order On Board 23/02/2018 (1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has made a complaint to the Collector, Surajpur for redressal of his grievances, which has not been considered and decided till now and, therefore, the same may be directed to be decided expeditiously.

(2) Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable and accordingly the same is allowed.

(3) Be that as it may, the Collector, Surajpur is directed to consider and decide the petitioner's complaint in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period for six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order after hearing the affected parties.

(4) With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge D/-