Gopal Kishan Mehrotra v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1454 of 2020
1. Gopal Kishan Mehrotra S/o Dr. Harinath Mehtrotra, Aged About 38 Years Working As Assistant Grade-3, Office Of Deputy Director Public Prosecution, Ambikapur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh
2. Ashish Kumar Singh S/o Shri Chandra Bhushan Singh Aged About 28 Years Working As Assistant Grade-3, Office Of Deputy Director Public Prosecution, Surajpur, District- Surajpur, Chhattisgarh
3. Rahul Paikra S/o Ramnathh Paikra Aged About 31 Years Working As Assistant Grade-3, Office Of Assistant Public Prosecution, Ramanujganj, DistrictBalrampur, Chhattisgarh
4. Jitendra Kumar Shandilya S/o Shri Dharmasai Aged About 37 Years Assistant Public Prosecution, Rajpur, District- Balrampur, Chhattisgarh
5. Rajni Paikra W/o Satyanarayan Paikra Aged About 38 Years Working As Assistant Grade-3, Office Of Deputy Director Public Prosecution, Ambikapur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh
6. Roshan Kujur S/o Late Shri Puran Prakash Kujur Aged About 32 Years Working As Assistant Grade-3, Office Of Deputy Director Public Prosecution, Ambikapur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Home, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantalaya Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. Director Public Prosecution, State Of C.G. Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisarh
3. Deputy Director Public Prosecution, Ambikapur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh
4. Deputy Director Public Prosecution, Surajpur, District, Surajpur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :
Shri K.S. Pawar, Advocate with Shri Shashi Kumar Kushwaha, Advocate For Respondents/State :
Shri Kunal Das, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board
03/03/20
1. Grievance of the petitioners is that the petitioners were appointed as Assistant Grade-III with a condition that first two years would be the probation period. It is stated that subsequently after completion of probation, 7 years have passed and though there is no complaint has been reported against the petitioners, the petitioners have not been regularized till date.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that considering the conduct of the petitioners, the recommendation Annexure P-3 was made by the Deputy Director Prosecution on 28.08.2015 to the Director Prosecution to regularize the services of the petitioners and grant them regular pay scale, as prayed for in the application by the petitioners. The petitioners therefore submit that the representation of the petitioners, which has already been recommended by the Deputy Director Prosecution to the Director Prosecution by letter dated 28.08.2015 may be considered and the petitioners may be regularized.
3. Considering the limited grievance of the petitioners and after perusal of Annexure P-3, it appears that the petitioners have already filed an application for regularization, as they have successfully completed their period of probation. Having been completed such period of probation, if the representation of the petitioners is pending, the Director Prosecution is directed to decide the representation of the petitioners within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
4. With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Ashu