Laddi @ Harpal Singh v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 1233 of 2020 • Laddi @ Harpal Singh S/o Sardar Gurcharan Singh Aged About 53 Years R/o Budhwari Para, Dongargarh, Tahsil - Dongargarh, District - Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh.
---- Applicant
Versus
• State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station - Dongargarh, District - Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent MCRC No. 1459 of 2020 • Laddi @ Harpal Singh S/o Shri Sardar Gurucharan Singh Aged About 53 Years R/o Budhwaripara, Police Station Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh.
---- Applicant
Versus
• State Of Chhattisgarh Though Police Station Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent MCRC No. 1460 of 2020 • Laddi @ Harpal Singh S/o Shri Sardar Gurucharan Singh Aged About 53 Years R/o Budhwaripara, P.S. - Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Applicant
Versus
• State Of Chhattisgarh Through P.S. Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent MCRC No. 1462 of 2020 • Laddi @ Harpal Singh S/o Shri Sardar Gurucharan Singh Aged
About 53 Years R/o Budhwaripara, Police Station- Dongargarh, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.
---- Applicant
Versus
• State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Police Station- Dongargarh, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent MCRC No. 1464 of 2020 • Laddi @ Harpal Singh, S/o Shri Sardar Gurucharan Singh, Aged About 53 Years R/o Budhwaripara, Police Station Dongargarh, District - Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh.
---- Applicant
Versus
• State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station - Dongargarh, District - Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent MCRC No. 1469 of 2020 • Laddi @ Harpal Singh S/o Shri Sardar Gurucharan Singh Aged About 53 Years R/o Budhwaripara, P.S. Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh, ---- Applicant
Versus
• State Of Chhattisgarh Through P.S. Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Applicant : Shri Devershi Thakur, Advocate For Respondent/State : Ms. Veena Nair, Dy.AG
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey Order On Board 02/06/2020 Since all the above bail applications are filed on behalf of the one and the same applicant, they are being disposed of by this common order.
The applicant has filed these applications under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail as he is in custody in connection with Crime Nos.518/2019 in M.Cr.C. No. 1233/2020; 508/2019 in M.Cr.C. No. 1459/2020; 506/2019 in M.Cr.C. No. 1469/2020; 503/2019 in M.Cr.C. No. 1460/2020; 517/2019 in M.Cr.C. No. 1462/2020; 525/2019 in M.Cr.C. No. 1464/2020; registered at police station Dongergarh, district Rajnandaon (CG) for the offence punishable under Sections 420,467,468,471,34 and 120-B IPC.
As per prosecution case, while loan under the Kisan Credit Card was being advanced by the Punjab National Bank, the applicant is alleged to have obtained the same in the name of villagers against the lands in their names and on phusi8cal verification, it was found that false documents have been prepared.
Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the crime in question. He submits that he was only the broker at the behest of Bank Officers. He further submits that the fraud has been played by the Bank Officers and the allegation has been attributed to the applicant and therefore the applicant may be released on bail.
On the other hand counsel for the State opposes the bail applications and submits that the investigation is going on against the applicant.
Having heard counsel for the parties, and considering the fact that the investigation is going on, I am not inclined to release him on regular bail. Accordingly, his applications filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure are rejected.
Sd/- (Rajani Dubey) Judge suguna