Jeevan Muskan Samajik Seva Sanstha v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. 703 of 2020 Jeevan Muskan Samajik Seva Sanstha, Geedam, Civil And Revenue District South Bastar Dantewada, Chhattisgarh, President Shri Trilok Surana, Through Manish Kumar Pande S/o Shri Anant Prasad Pande, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Quarter No. 275/1, Behind Of Civil Court, Near Shiv Mandir, Manendragarh, Police Station And Tahsil Manendragarh, Civil And Revenue District Koria, Chhattisgarh (Power Of Attorney Holder) ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Forest Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. The Principal Chief Conservator Of Forest (Campa) Aranya Bhawan, Medical College Road, Raipur, Civil And Revenue District Raipur Chhattisgarh
3. The Chief Conservator Of Forest, Forest Circle Jagdalpur, Civil And Revenue District Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh
4. The Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division Bastar Jagdalpur, Civil And Revenue District Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh
5. The Sub Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Sub Division Bhanpuri, Civil And Revenue District Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh
6. The Sub Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Sub Division Chitrakot, Civil And Revenue District Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh
7. The Sub Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Sub Division Bastar, Civil And Revenue District Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh
8. The Forest Range Officer, Forest Range Chitrakot, Civil And Revenue District Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh
9. The Forest Range Officer, Forest Range Bhanpuri, Civil And Revenue District Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh 10.
The Forest Range Officer, Forest Range Bastanar, Civil And Revenue District Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh 11.The Forest Range Officer, Forest Range Bastar, Civil And Revenue District Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh 12.
The Forest Range Officer, Forest Range Tokapal, Civil And Revenue District Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh 13.
The Forest Range Officer, Forest Range Lohandiguda, Civil And Revenue District Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :
Mr. Paras Mani Shriwas, Advocate For State :
Mr. Ayaz Naved, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 20.02.2020
1. The claim of the petitioner in the present writ petition is for an appropriate direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation so far as releasing of the amount payable to the petitioner imparting training to the farmers for Mashroom Cultivation, Vermiculture & Vermicomposting and Organic Grower under the State Govt. Skill Development Training Programme.
2. The contention of the counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner had imparted such training to different farmers and different groups of people in different villages for which they are entitled for the amount agreed upon by the respondents for imparting such training. However,
in spite of repeated representations and reminders, the respondents have till date not cleared the dues to the petitioner.
3. The State counsel submits that the representations of the petitioner are all pending and the same shall be considered and decided on its own merits subject to verification of the actual facts of the case so far as the entitlement part is concerned.
4. Given the said submission on either side and considering the limited relief that the petitioner has sought for, this Court is of the opinion that ends of justice would meet if the petitioner is directed to make a fresh representation to the concerned authorities along with all relevant documents in support of their claim within a period of 15 days from today and the concerned respondent thereafter shall take an appropriate decision on the said representation, after due verification of the entitlement of the petitioner, at the earliest preferably within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of the representation of the petitioner.
5. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Khatai