← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/948/2016disposed off

Mannu Ram Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-03-31Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P. (S) No.

9 48 of 201 Mannu Ram Sahu (wrongly mentioned as Mannu Lal Sahu in the impugned order), S/o Itwari Ram Sahu, aged about 61 years, 1 month, posted as a Assistant Engineer, Rural Connectivity Training and Research Centre Nimora, District Raipur (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.)

2. Engineer-in-Chief, Chhattisgarh Gramin Sadak Vikash Abhikaran, Vikash Bhawan, Civil Lines, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

3. Collector, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

4. Director, Gramin Sampark Prasikshan Evam Anusandhan Kendra, Nimora, District Raipur (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioner:

Mr. Rakesh Pandey, Advocate.

For Respondents/State: Mr. D.R. Minj, Dy. Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board /0 3 /201 Heard.

(1) Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has been transferred from Nimora, District Raipur to Korba and he has to retire within 11 months from the date of his transfer order dated 21.12.2015 and, therefore, he may be allowed to make representation to the State Government for redressal of his grievances

and the same may be directed to be decided within the specific time frame.

(2) Prayer appears to be fair & reasonable.

(3) Be that as it may, if the petitioner prefers representation before the State Government within a period of two weeks from today, it is directed to be decided by the authority concerned within a period of four weeks from the receipt thereof.

(4) For the period of six weeks, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner.

(5) With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands finally disposed of.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge D/-