← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1444/2015disposed off

Ashok Kumar Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

2015-04-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1444 of 2015 • Ashok Kumar Sahu S/O Late Shri Suresh Kumar Sahu Aged About 54 years Head Master, Government Middle School Basia, Bilha, Block Bilha, Distt. Bilaspur, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

2. Director, Public Instruction, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

3. District Education Officer, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, (Chhattisgarh)

4. Block Education Officer, Bilha, Distt. Bilaspur, (Chhattisgarh)

5. Joint Director, Treasury, Account, Pension, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri KS Pawar, Advocate For Respondent/State :

Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dy. AG for kl?:the State Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 27/04/2015

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that time-bound pay has been sanctioned in favour of the petitioner vide order dated 1-1-2014, however, monitory benefit has not been paid to the petitioner. He would submit that the petitioner is desirous of submitting a representation raising his grievance before the competent authority, therefore, instead of deciding this petition on merits, the same may be disposed of by directing the

respondents to decide representation.

2. Learned State counsel would submit that if any representation is submitted and the order dated 1-1-2014 is still in existence & operative, petitioner's representation shall be considered, in accordance with law.

3. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that in the event, the petitioner prefers fresh representation before the competent authority within a period of one month from today, the said authority shall consider and decide the representation by a speaking order, at the earliest, preferably within a period of three months from the date of submission of representation.

JUDGE ashu