Jai Ambe Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 534 of 2018 Jai Ambe Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh Gram Darra, Development Block Kasdol, District- Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. Through It's President, Smt. Mela Bai Sahu Wife Of Shri Ram Lakhan Sahu Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Darra, Post Giraudpuri Thana Giraudpuri, Development Block Kasdol, District- Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Women And Child Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, DistrictRaipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Commissioner, Department Of Women And Child Development, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Mandir Hasod, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. District Collector, Collectorate, Baloda Bazar, District- Baloda BazarBhatapara, Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

4. District Programme Officer, Women And Child Development Department, Collectorate Compund, District- Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

5. Child Development Project Officer, Integrated Child Development Project, Kasdol District- Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ----Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Amrito Das, Advocate.

For Respondents/State :

Mr. Arun Sao, Dy. Advocate General.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 28/02/2018 1.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that by virtue of clause 11.3 of the amended instructions dated 05.06.2017, the petitioner is entitled to continue for the period of five years and then only the circular dated 05.06.2017 would apply but on the other hand by order dated

01.02.2018, District Programme Officer has called for fresh application for supply of ready to eat food for his area i.e. Hasua Sector in Kasdol project. 2.

Be that as it may, the petitioner is at liberty to make representation before the District Programme Officer within a period of seven days from today bringing to his notice Clause 11.3 of the amended instructions dated 05.06.2017, which will be considered and decided within a further period of seven days from the date of receipt of such representation in accordance with law.

3.

With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands finally disposed of.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka