Arti Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh Gram Sel, v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 537 of 2018 Arti Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh Gram Sel, Development Block Kasdol District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh, Through Its President Smt. Shayam Kumari Jaiswal Wife Of Shir Naresh Chand Jaiswal , Aged About 38 Years, R/o Village Sel, Development Block Kasdol District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Women And Child Development Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Commissioner, Department Of Women And Child Development Indravati Bhawan Naya Raipur Mandir Hasod District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. District Collector, Collectorate, Baloda Bazar District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

4. District Programme Officer, Women And Child Development Department Collectorate Compound District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

5. Child Deveopment Project Officer, Integrated Child Development Project Kasdol District Baloda Bazaar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ----Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Amrito Das, Advocate.

For Respondents/State :

Mr. Arun Sao, Dy. Advocate General.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 28/02/2018 1.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that by virtue of clause 11.3 of the amended instructions dated 05.06.2017, the petitioner is entitled to continue for the period of five years and then only the

circular dated 05.06.2017 would apply but on the other hand by order dated 02.02.2018, District Programme Officer has called for fresh application for supply of ready to eat food for his area i.e. Sarva Sector under Kasdol Project.

2.

Be that as it may, the petitioner is at liberty to make representation before the District Programme Officer within a period of seven days from today bringing to his notice Clause 11.3 of the amended instructions dated 05.06.2017, which will be considered and decided within a further period of seven days from the date of receipt of such representation in accordance with law.

3.

With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands finally disposed of.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka