Jagdish Patel v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.964 of 2016 Ram Gopal Choudhari, son of Shri Manbodhan Choudhari, aged about 42 years, Assistant Teacher Panchayat, Government Primary School, Kodpali, Block Pusore, District Raigarh (CG). State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Panchayat and Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur (CG).
Writ Petition (S) No.965 of 2016 Smt. Meera Patel, wife of Shri Umakant Patel, aged about 37 School, Nandeli, Block Pusore, District Raigarh (CG).
Writ Petition (S) No.969 of 2016 Uddhav Lal Sao, son of late Chaituram Sao, aged about 42 School, Amlipali, Block Pusore, District Raigarh (CG). Collector, Raigarh, District Raigarh (CG).
5.
Writ Petition (S) No.989 of 2016 Shani Ram Parja, son of Shri Ghasiram Parja, aged about 47 School, Linjir, Block Pusore, District Raigarh (CG).
Writ Petition (S) No.993 of 2016 Jagdish Patel, son of Shri Balak Ram Patel, aged about 49 School, Changhori, Block Pusore, District Raigarh (CG). Writ Petition (S) No.994 of 2016 Yad Ram Sidar, son of Shri Souki Lal Sidar, aged about 45 School, Gorra, Block Pusore, District Raigarh, R/o Village Jampali, Post Kotara, District Raigarh (CG).
Writ Petition (S) No.995 of 2016 Sampat Lal Bhoi, son of Shri Pyari Lal Bhoi, aged about 46 School, Dipapara, Kensara, Block Pusore, District Raigarh (CG). Writ Petition (S) No.997 of 2016 Lalit Kumar Patel, son of Shri Bahadur Singh Patel, aged about 44 years, working as Assistant Teacher Panchayat, Government Primary School Mouharideepa, Block Pusore, District Raigarh, R/o Village Dhangaon, Post Putkapuri, Tahsil Pusore, District For Petitioner :
Shri K.S. Pawar, Advocate For Respondents/State :
Shri Arun Sao, Dy.A.G.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 04/04/2016 (1) Heard.
(2) Learned State Counsel would submit that in view of the order passed by the Division Bench in Writ Appeal No.227 of 2015 'Anil Kumar Ramtake and others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others' and other connected matters vide order dated 23.04.2015 and the subsequent circular issued by the State Government on 28.04.2015 petitioners entitlement for Kramonnati Vetanman shall be considered in accordance with law.
(3) In view of the above, petitioners' case may be examined in accordance with the State Government circular dated 28.04.2015 and necessary orders may be passed within a period of three months from the date of submission of fresh representation by the petitioners. (4) Accordingly, the writ petitions are disposed of in the above terms.
(5) It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall pass an order on its own merits in accordance with law. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge