← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/390/2012disposed off

Piyush Minj v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

2015-07-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 390 of 2012

1. Piyush Minj S/o Late Juliyus Minj, aged about 50 years, working as Full Time Sweeper (Swachakar), Govt. Poultry Farm Raigarh, Thasil and Dist Raigarh CG.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Veterinary Department, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur, CG

2. Director, Veterinary Services, Raipur, CG.

3. Deputy Director Veterinary Service Raigarh Cg ---- Respondent For Petitioner Shri Harish Khuntiya, Advocate For Respondent/State Shri Shashank Thakur, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 10/07/2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

1.

Grievance of the petitioner is that though the petitioner is working as daily wager since 28-2-1992, but the petitioner's case is not being considered for his regularization in accordance with the circular of the State Government dated 5-3-2008.

2.

In reply to above, State counsel submits that if the petitioner files fresh representation along with copy of the

petition, the same shall be considered in accordance with law.

3.

In view of the above, the petition stands disposed of. If the petitioner files fresh representation along with copy of the petition, then competent authority of the respondent authorities are directed to consider and decide the petitioner's case for regularization strictly in accordance with State Government's circular dated 5-3-2008 issued in compliance of the decision of the Supreme Court in Secretary, State of Karnataka and Others v. Umadevi (3) and Others1, on its own merits and in accordance with law, as early as possible, preferably, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of representations.

4.

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall decide the representation, on its own merits, strictly in accordance with law, without treating any observation made in this order, as opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra Gowri (2006) 4 SCC 1