Alook Kumar Soor v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.1508 OF 2019

1. Alook Kumar Soor S/o Late Shri K.P. Soor Aged About 64 Years R/o H- 7, Gayatri Nagar, Pink City, Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh.

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, New Raipur, Village Rakhi, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director Department Of Urban Administration And Devlopment, Directorate, Indrawati Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Municipal Corporation Through Its Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Chirmiri, District Korea Chhattisgarh.

4. Chief Municipal Offcier Nagar, Palika Nigam, Chirmiri, District Korea Chhattisgarh., District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner :

Shri Yogesh Pandey, Advocate.

For Respondent-State :

Shri Saleem Kazi, Dy. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 05.03.2019 1.

The limited grievance of the petitioner is that, the petitioner retired from the post of Dy. Chief Executive Officer working under the respondent No.2 w.e.f. 30.04.2017. According to the petitioner, before his retirement the petitioner had put in service of more than 12 years without any promotion and therefore he was entitled for the benefit of time bound pay scale which the government employee receives on completion of 10 years of service without promotion. 2.

The counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner has made many representations in this regard but the authorities have not decided the same. Neither have they granted the relief and

thereby the retiral dues payable to the petitioner also has been paid less than what he was otherwise entitled for. 3.

Given the said limited grievance that the petitioner has raised, let the respondent No.2 take a decision on the representation so made by the petitioner within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. The petitioner would also be entitled for fresh representation, if he so choses.

4.

The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge inder