Durgesh Kumar Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.
IN THE HON'BLB HIGH COURT OF CHHmSGARH AT
BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No.
/2015 PETITIONER:
Durgesh Kumar Sahu, S/o Shri Kumbhlal Sahu, Aged about 24 years, posted as Assistant Grade-III at Govt. High School Gunsari, Block Takhatpur, District Bilaspur;
R/o village 6s post Daukapa, Tahsil 8& PS Lormi, Dista-ict Mungeli (C.G.)
VERSUS
State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Deparbment of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS: 1 The Managing Director, Rajya Madhyamik Shiksha Mission, office of Rajya Pariyojna, IInd Floor, Shiksha Ekikrit Bhawan, Pension Bada, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2.
The Director, Directorate of Public Instructions Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3.
The District Education Officer, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4.
Union of India, through the Secretaiy, Ministry of Human Resources Department, School Education & Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi110001 5:
PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS
I-HC-78 'SSSt '^wivf'sf^ yTfl'M'16, Ripiiyy WTRT aW1^)...^.?..S:?^..U:.-J./....:...W^ 201 3n^[ ^ra^i ( ^diy^Ef ) sn^t^ii R-ti'ti ^Rnw^f^itri^ «t)Wfd41"ltil*ld1fl fei<fl <Rf+41< ^isiRingi^ ^ai^R^a sn^t S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice Prbshant Kumar Mishra 29.04.2015 W.P.(SlNos. 1510. 11515.1517.1518 and 1519/2015 Shri MateenSiddiqui, ( tounsel for the petitioner(s).
Shri Chandresh Shriva ^tava, P.L for the State.
Shri Vinay Pandey an El Shri Ashwani Shukla, counsel for Union of India.
Heard.
Issue notice to the rejspondents on payment of process fee, as per rules, failing whicl |i the petition shall stand dismissed automatically without refereno fe to the Court.
List it along with W.P.(S t)No. 1390/2015.
Sd//- prashantKumarMishra Judge y-
XI-HC - 78 '^) ^3^1 •^IWW't-l, Ui'^\)vi6, Rollt-l^ ^FT^TT WW W.P.fSI 1515/2015 3TT^?T iRrg, (ijc|(^^6T) (TatT 3IT^?T (b<lfct) ?WtieR tlftcT 3IT^?T cbi^Fci'li1'i 'irrrof ^r fei^t ^> grf?m sn^r an^T ^PT 28.07.2015 This case is treated as dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory court's order dated 29.04.2015 (for details may kindly be seen note sheet part).
Counsel be informed, accordingly.
Sd/- R (Judidal) ^-