High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/1012/2012withdrawn

Suresh Kumar Agrawal v. Cg. State Information Comm. And ORS.

2015-09-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice Pritinker Diwaker2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 1012 of 2012

1. Suresh Kumar Agrawal S/o Late Shri Rameshwar Lal Agrawal aged about 56 years R/o Abhilash Traders Gurunanak Chowk Raipur CG. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Chhattisgarh State Information Commission, Raipur, Nirmal Chhaya Bhawan, Meera Datar Road, Shanker Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh through the Chief Information Commissioner

2. Inspector General Of Registration And Superintendent Stamps Plot No. 11 New Tilak Nagar Opposite Shivamandir Awanti Vihar Telibandha Distt. Raipur CG

3. Public Information Officer Distt. Registrar Stamps Distt. Registrar Officer Collectorate Campus Ghadi Chowk Raipur CG ---- Respondent For Petitioner : Shri Amrito Das & Shri K. Rohan, Advocates For Respondent No.1 : Shri Shyam Tekchandani, Advocate. For Respondent Nos.2 & 3: Shri Rahul Tamaskar, P.L. Hon'ble Shri Justice Pritinker Diwaker Order On Board 03/09/2015 Challenge in the present writ petition is to the order dated 20.10.2011 (Annexure P/1) passed by respondent No.1 Chhattisgarh State Information Commission partly accepting appeal preferred by the petitioner and permitting him to submit the list of documents with respect to which the information is sought. The appellate authority has further directed that information be given to the petitioner on payment of requisite fee.

2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file appropriate application showing the list of documents with respect to which the information is sought. He submits that the petitioner would pay due fee in this respect as provided under the law.

He, however, submits that the Public Information Officer may be directed to ensure supply of the requisite documents expeditiously.

3. Counsel appearing for the respondents have no objection to the proposition as put forth by the petitioner.

4. The petitioner is permitted to withdraw this petition with the aforesaid liberty. Needless to state, in case of filing such application by the petitioner before the Public Information Officer/respondent No.3, after completing all the formalities the authority would act in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible.

Sd/ (Pritinker Diwaker) Judge Khan