Smt. Pando Bai v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCC No. 901 of 2017 Smt. Pando Bai W/o Late Shri Panduram Jhadi, Aged About 52 Years R/o F O H Colony, Q. No. 552 Bacheli, Tahsil & District Dantewada (Chhattisgarh) ---- Applicant

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. Collector, Bijapur, District Bijapur Chhattisgarh

3. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development, Bijapur, Dist. Bijapur (Chhattisgarh)

4. Sub Divisional Officer ( Revenue), Bhopalpatnam, District Bijapur (Chhattisgarh)

5. Tahsildar, Usoor Head Office Aavapalli, District Bijapur (Chhattisgarh)

6. Block Education Officer, Usoor Head Office Aavapalli, District Bijapur (Chhattisgarh)

7. Sub Engineer, R. E. S. Sub Division, Usoor, District Bijapur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Applicant :

Mr. Samir Singh, Advocate For State :

Mr. Avinash Singh, Panel Lawyer S.B.:Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 06/12/2017 Heard.

1.

There is a prayer for extension of time on the submission that the petitioner being poor widow lady residing in remote district of Dantewada could not manage to file the appeal within the time stipulated by the Court. 2.

Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner's circumstances stated in the application, I am inclined to grant further period of 15 days. In case, the petitioner approaches the Rent Control Tribunal within 15 days from today, the Tribunal shall decide the matter on its own merit without going into the aspect of limitation. However, if the application is not filed within the said period, it would be open for the petitioner to explain delay beyond 15 days before the Tribunal. 3.

The MCC is accordingly disposed off.

Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Rekha