← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1048/2016disposed off

Sushil Kumar Dhritlahre v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-04-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.1048 of 2016 Sushil Kumar Dhritlahre, aged about 38 years, S/o Shri Dayaram Dhritlahare, Earlier posted as Hostel Superintendent, at Advasi Balak Ashram, Aamadob Block Gaurela, R/o Village Jorapara (Mochh), Tahsil & P.S. Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (CG).

---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (CG).

2.

Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (CG).

3.

Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (CG).

4.

Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue), Pendra Road, District Bilaspur (CG).

5.

Circle Coordinator, Gaurela, District Bilaspur (CG). 6.

Block Education Officer, Gaurela, District Bilaspur (CG). 7.

Vijay Pal Singh Dhruv, presently posted at Hostel Superintendent at Advasi Balak Ashram Aamadob, Block Gaurela, District Bilaspur (CG).

---- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate.

For Respondents/State : Shri Om Prakash Sahu, G.A. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 07/04/2016 (1) Heard.

(2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that

the petitioner has been removed from the post of Hostel Superintendent and he has been posted at Government Middle School Belgohani, Block Gaurela, District Bilaspur by the impugned order dated 23.01.2016 passed by respondent No.3Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department, Bilaspur and therefore, he may be permitted to file representation before respondent No.2-Collector, Bilaspur for redressal of his grievances.

(3) Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable.

(4) The petitioner is permitted to file representation before respondent No.2-Collector, Bilaspur. If such representation is made by the petitioner, the Collector, Bilaspur shall consider and decide the same on its own merit and in accordance with law expeditiously from the date of receipt of representation along with copy of this order.

(5) With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-