High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6617/2017disposed off

Smt. Pancho Bai v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-11-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 6617 of 2017 Smt. Pancho Bai W/o Shri Kanhaiya Lal, Aged About 66 Years R/o Village Aktai, Post Office Surpa, Police Station- Rani Taralai, Tahsil Patan, District Durg, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Public Works Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. The Engineer-In- Chief, Public Works Department, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Near Raj Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Joint Director, Treasury Account And Pension, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

4. Sub Divisional Engineer, (Bha/ Sa), Public Works Department, Sub Division, Patan, District Durg, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents Shri Ajay Shrivastava, counsel for the petitioner/s. Shri A.S.Kachhawaha, Addl. A.G. for the State. Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 29/11/2017 Heard.

1. Learned counsel for the parties would jointly and fairly submit that the matter in issue is covered by the common order dated 26.2.2015 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.281 of 2013 (Lakhanram Sahu and others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others) and other connected writ appeals. Against the said order, the State travelled up to the Supreme Court by filing SLP (C) Nos.11541-11550/2016, which have been dismissed by the Supreme Court, affirming the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court. They would pray that this writ petition may also be allowed in the same terms.

2. In view of the above joint statement made, the present writ petition is also allowed in terms of the common order dated 26.2.2015 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in WA No.281 of 2013 (Lakhanram Sahu and others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others) and other connected writ appeals. Let the current pension of the petitioner be calculated and payment commenced preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt and/or presentation of a copy of this order and the arrears to be paid within a period of 12 months from the date current pension starts.

3. A copy of the order dated 26.2.2015 passed in WA No.281 of 2013 (Lakhanram Sahu and others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others) and other connected writ appeals, be made a part of this record.

Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Deepti