High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1532/2021disposed off

Manik Chand Yadav v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-03-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 1532 of 2021

1. Manik Chand Yadav S/o Shri Ramshay Yadav Aged About 49 Years Occupation Assistant Teacher L.B. Government Priamary School Borsi , Resident Gram Borsi Thana Bhatapara Block Bhatapara District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary , School Education Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Secretary Panchayat , Rural Department And Labour Department , Mantralaya Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. District Education Officer Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

4. Chief Execuite Officer Janpad Panchayat Bhatapara District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh

5. Block Education Officer Office Block Education Officer Bhatapara District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

---Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Abdul Wahab Khan, Advocate.

For State :

Shri Aditya Bhardwaj, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 22.03.2021 .

1. The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition is the inaction on the part of the respondents in not granting the benefits of the Higher pay-scale which the petitioner was entitled for on completion of 10 years of service on the post of Assistant Teacher Panchayat (A.LB).

2. According to the counsel for the petitioner, the respondent No. 4 as early as on 18.11.2019 had sanctioned the higher pay-scale to the petitioner on competition of 10 years of service, however, till date the order has not been implemented so far as the petitioner is concerned.

-23. Given the limited relief that the petitioner has the writ petition at this juncture is disposed of directing the respondent No. 4 to ensure that unless the order Annexure P/1 is implemented in its letter and spirit at the earliest preferably within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order, unless the impugned order Annexure P/1 has been cancelled, withdrawn or modified at a later stage.

4. Accordingly the writ petition is disposed of.S Sd/-/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Jyotijha