← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6918/2017disposed off

Rohini Kumar Yadav v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-12-15Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 6918 of 2017 Rohini Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Indrapal Yadav, Aged About 40 Years Occupation Assistant Teacher (Panchayat), Govt. Primary School Jhulandongari, Sankul Banshital, R/o Village Jhulandongari, Block Marwahi, Thana Marwahi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Panchayat And Gramin Vikash Vibhag, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Mission Director, Rajya Pariyojana Office, Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission , Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat And Exofficio District Project Director, Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission, Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Marwahi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

5. Collector And District Mission Director, Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

6. District Education Officer, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

7. Block Education Officer, Marwahi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

8. Ravindra Kumar Pant, S/o Anand Pant, Assistant Teacher(Panchayat), Govt. Primary School Mullidand, Sankul Banshital, Block Marwahi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

--- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Rajendra Kumar Patel, Advocate For Respondent/State :

Mr. Satish Gupta, G.A.

For Respondents/ :

Ms. Pushpa Dwivedi, Advocate Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission S.B.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 15/12/2017 Heard.

1. The petitioner has challenged the impugned order on the ground that earlier

-2the petitioner was given additional charge of Block Coordinator Banshital on 29.06.2017. Now, by impugned order, another teacher has been given the charge. It is also submitted that there were complaints against respondent No.8/Ravindra Kumar Pant even then charge has been given to him.

2. A perusal of order dated 29.06.2017 shows that the petitioner was substantively posted as Assistant Teacher Panchayat in primary school, Jhulandhongri and additional work of Coordinator in Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission which was given to the petitioner has now been given to some other teacher. Therefore, on this ground, no interference is called for.

3. However, it has been stated in the petition that there were number of complaints against respondent No.8/Ravindra Kumar Pant, yet he has been given the work. This aspect may be examined by the Collector and the State Mission Director, Rajiv Gandhi Shiksha Mission and decision may be taken in two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed off. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Rekha