High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1170/2020disposed off

Smt. Neeta Yadav v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-02-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WP(S) No.1170 of 2020

1. Smt. Neeta Yadav W/o Rudra Kumar Yadav Aged About 39 Years Presently Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Government Boys Primary School, Sarkade, Block Chhura, District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh

2. Hirau Ram Sahu S/o Jivrakhan Lal Sahu Aged About 49 Years Presently Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Government Higher Secondary School, Murmura , Block Chhura, District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh

3. Ishwar Lal Sahu S/o Biseshwar Ram Sahu Aged About 44 Years Presently Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Government Higher Secondary School , Murmura, Block Chhura, District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh

4. Pem Singh Nagesh S/o Ram Ratan Nagesh Aged About 43 Years Presently Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Government Higher Secondary School , Murmura, Block Chhura, District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh

5. Smt Pushpa Tawarkar W/o Nitesh Kumar Tawarkar Aged About 30 Years Presently Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Government High School , Sankara, Block Chhura, District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Education Department, Mantralaya , Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. The Secretary Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development , Mantralaya , Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. District Education Officer Gariaband, District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh

4. Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat, Gariaband, District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh

5. Block Education Officer Block Chhura, District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr. C.J.K. Rao, Advocate For Respondent/ State :

Mr. Neeraj Pradhan, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board

24.02.2020 1.

The limited grievance of the petitioners are that petitioners are entitled for the benefit of Kramonnati on completing 10 years of service which they have completed, but they have not been given the same till date. 2.

Given the limited grievance raised, let the petitioners makes detailed representation in this regard respondents 3 & 4 who in turn shall scrutinize the same and pass a suitable order in accordance with the rules governing the field of Kramonnati. It is expected that an appropriate order shall be passed within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of representation of the petitioners. 3.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge Yasmin/Jyoti