Smt. Jyoti Agnihotri v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1531 of 2015 • Smt. Jyoti Agnihotri W/o Shri Nishikant Agnihotri Aged About 48 years Occupation- Service, Presently Posted As Lecturer (Chemistry), Government Girls Higher Secondary School, Dharamjaigarh, Distt. Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of Tribal, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. The Secretary, Department of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

3. Commissioner, Department of Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Development, Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

4. Asst. Commissioner, Department of Tribal, Raigarh (Chhattisgarh)

5. Deputy Director (Treasury, Accounts & Pension) Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)

6. The District Education Officer, Raigrh (Chhattisgarh)

7. The Principal, Government Girls Higher Secondary School- Dharamjaigarh, Distt. Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri AN Bhakta, Advocate For Respondent/State :

Shri Shashank Thakur, GA for the State Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 30/04/2015 1.

This petition has been preferred for a direction to the respondents to grant her benefit of Rule 22-D of the Fundamental Rules, from the date of promotion from the post of UDT to Lecturer with arrears and other consequential benefits.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the representation filed by the petitioner is pending consideration, therefore, at this stage, the petitioner confines her prayer for a direction to the respondents to consider and decide her representation.

3.

Learned State counsel would submit that the representation shall be considered in accordance with law.

4.

Considering the limited relief prayed for at this stage, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that in the event, the petitioner prefers fresh representation before the competent authority within a period of one month from today, the said authority shall consider and decide the same, in accordance with law, by a speaking order, at the earliest, preferably within a period of six months from the date of representation. JUDGE ashu