← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1190/2020disposed off

Faleshwar Kurre v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-02-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1190 of 2020

1. Faleshwar Kurre S/o Shri Dhanaji Ram Aged About 35 Years Presently Working As Assistant Teacher (Lb) Government Paimary School Darba, Block Kurud, District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh

2. Lukesh Sahu S/o Shri Geeturam Sahu Aged About 38 Years Presently Working As Assistant Teacher (Lb) Government Paimary School AmaparaKamrwaid, Block Kurud, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur Chhattisgarh, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Director Directorate Of Chhattisgarh Public Instruction, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. The District Education Officer Dhamtari, District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr. Sanjeev Ku. Sahu and Mr.

Shatrughan Sahu, Advocates For Respondent/State :

Mr. Ravish Verma, G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 24.02.2020

1. Heard.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the issue involved in the present writ petition has already been considered and decided by this Court in WPS No.6278 of 2019, therefore, the same order may be passed in the present writ petition also.

3. This Court in WPS No.6278 of 2019 on 20.08.2019 has passed the following order:- "2.The limited grievance of the petitioners are that petitioners are entitled for the benefit of Kramonnati on completing 10 years of service which they have

completed, but they have not been given the same till date.

3. Given the limited grievance raised, let the petitioners makes detailed representation in this regard to the respondents 3 & 4 who in turn shall scrutinize the same and pass a suitable order in accordance with the rules governing the field of Kramonnati. It is expected that an appropriate order shall be passed within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of representation of the petitioners.

4. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of."

4. Learned State counsel has no objection.

5. It is ordered accordingly. The ratio laid down in the case supra shall also govern the cause of lis in this case and will have the same effect and operation.

6. With such observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge yasmin