← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWP/1121/2002dissmiss for defaultnonprosecution

Surendra Singh Gumber v. C.S.I.D.C. And Others

2017-04-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice Chandra Bhushan Bajpai3 pages

u ~<m:'z:~»mmw'

::v::g::w).., v I - < a» OF CHHATTISG$§RH AT BILSPUR 1N THE H1GH COURT Writ Petiu'on No i l 2 1/2002 r'

ra Singh Gmnber?

W, 1d gEmQNER x;

/ Sf Q PreeiarnSingh Guxnbe v Aged abrmt i£3 yggm, a M i"

R/'Q arsh Colgny, Yistrict- Bilaspur.

% %b\ M41» » Va'ms- > P9NDEN'E :

1, M. R émal Ci'ai'pmia'ii-Jn Fma h S g .

Eiwug it'

Msaimgmg i'war't "

Finance Hausa, A- E Raac, .i, / imam (MR).

I i 2Q Degrmy General Wager.

NLR Financial Cprporaticm Pt. Deanéayal Uppadhyaya Nagar, Secmr~4, Eng Raad N0. 4, Mpur (ca).

a Bi'mié} fvfaimg§2 Mf' ¥Exaxaag11 Capaf-aw'im'z, Ehgh Ci-am't R'saqi Bifstrick- Bilaiqpm" {$3153.} ii 3&6 ChUadhm'y Ha:&'i€als, Near Mam-Bhavzha Ta1ab, Tikafaglafa §§J§§§aur £{LG'L W1???

PETETKON UI'IDER ARTIE 2.

'2?

SF THE CL 25;

THE CONSTITUTIDE NATURE OF OF INDIA 'MANDAMUS'

FOR ISU£3NCE PROHEBITIONK/ OF A WRIT IN $ £IERT10R§iR1 ETC'OR ANY OTHER DERECTIOE QR ORDER TO DO JUSTECE EN THE MATTER .

¢ Detaik 6f the wtm'an

/&'

s V/(i) Rapondent No.1:

Chhattisgarh State lndustial Development Corporation gx".

Through its Managing .

'\ "'

9%?"

Director L.l.c. Bhawan ".9"

'su-gs Gt§c 'p "

P/ Pandri Raipur (C.G.) iTiio DgpuQEoograi \a:

*Lri,, $ "oh v 'gé'i (ii) Repondent No. 2:

Manager, Chhattisgarh State lndusrial Deveiopmant Managing Director L.l.c. Bhawan Pandri Raipur (C.G.) cw"

Branch Manager (iii) Repondent No. 3:

x J:

Chhattisgarh State Industrial \ 4:

Developement Corporation Ltd. Biiaspur (C.G.)

m NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH BILASPUR WP No. 1121 of 2002 1.

Surendra Singh Gumber ---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

C.S.I.D.C. & Others ---- Respondents For Petitioner - None.

For Respondent No. 4 - Shri Anurag Verma, Advocate under the authority of Shri Ashish Shrivastava, Advocate.

For other respondents - None though represented Hon'ble Shri Justice Chandra Bhushan Balpa r er on Board O 28-04-201 7 1.

The petitioner is not represented when-the matter'is taken up for hearing.

2.

With this, this Cou tion but to dismiss this WP for want p of prosecution.

' m issed for want of prosecution.

3.

Consequently, the i n J Sd/.

\ 'k (Chandra Bhus'han Bajpai) JUDGE Aadil