High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/125/2017disposed off

Smt. Nasima Begam v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-07-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 125 of 2017 Smt. Nasima Begam W/o Late Akber Ansari, Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Nonbiri, Thana & Tahsil Kartala, Civil and Revenue District Korba (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through: The Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs (Police), New Raipur, Mantralaya, New Raipur, Civil And Revenue District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

2. The Director General Of Police, Raipur, Civil And Revenue District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

3. The Inspector General Of Police Range, Korba, Civil And Revenue Korba, (Chhattisgarh)

4. The Collector, Korba, Civil And Revenue District Korba, (Chhattisgarh)

5. Superintendent Of Police, Korba, Civil And Revenue District Korba, (Chhattisgarh)

6. District Magistrate, Korba, Civil And Revenue District Korba, (Chhattisgarh)

7. Station House Officer, Police Station Kartala, Korba, Civil And Revenue District Korba, (Chhattisgarh)

8. Raju @ Rajkumar, S/o Jage @ Uttam Kumar Gupta, Aged About 25 Years R/o Village Nonbirra, Kartala, Civil And Revenue District Korba, (Chhattisgarh)...........(Accused) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr.Sunil Verma, Advocate For State :

Mr.Dhiraj Wankhede, G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 13/7/2017

1. Learned State Counsel would submit that the petitioner is rape victim and ₹ 45,000/- has been directed to be released in favour of the petitioner as compensation. He would further submit that victim compensation scheme has been amended vide Notification No.F 387/2011/Home-Two w.e.f. 14th September, 2016 and as per scheme major rape victim is entitled for compensation to the tune of ₹ 1,00,000/-.

2. Be that as it may, the State Government will consider the case of the petitioner and grant her compensation as per notification dated 14th September, 2016 within a period of four weeks from today.

3. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition finally disposed off. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge B/-