Abhishek Chandraker v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1810 of 2018

1. Abhishek Chandraker S/o Shri Rohit Chandraker Aged About 25 Years R/o Jail Road Bathena Ward Dhamtari P. S. Dhamtari, District- Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh., District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh

2. Kanjay Rathia S/o Shri Maniram Rathiya Aged About 23 Years R/o Ward No. 40, Kota Road Savitri Nagar, Raigarh, P. S. Raigarh, District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

3. Hemant Sinha S/o Shri Dhanesh Sinha Aged About 27 Years R/o Abadi Para, Ward No. 1, Arjuni P. S. Dhamtari, District- Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh., District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh

4. Bhoj Kumar Jaiswal S/o Shri Bau Lal Jaiswal Aged About 22 Years R/o 145, Ward No. 10 Purana Basti, Saradih, Janjgir- Champa, P. S. JanjgirChampa, District- Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Agriculture Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Raipur, P. S. Abhanpur, DistrictRaipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director, Agriculture Directorate, Agriculture Raipur, P. S. Raipur, DistrictRaipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board, Through Secretary, Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Ms. Deepali Pandey, Advocate.

For Respondents/ State :

Mr. Dilman Rathi Minj, Dy. G. A.

For Respondents :

Dr. Saurabh K. Pande, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 28/02/18 1.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners would submit that

petitioners have applied for the regular post of Surveyor but their candidature has been rejected on the ground that they have not submitted the surveyor certificate from ITI whereas they are having Diploma in Civil Engineering and, therefore, they are eligible for consideration on the said post, against which they have also raised objections before the respondent authorities.

2.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 3.

Be that as it may, the respondent No. 2 - The Director, Agriculture Department, Raipur is directed to consider and decide the objections raised by the petitioners expeditiously preferably within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 4.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka