← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhREVP/38/2015withdrawn

Shri Mohammed Kamrujama, Died Thru- His Son Ashfaq Qumar v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

2015-08-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR REVP No. 37 of 2015 • Shri Mohammed Kamrujama, (Died) Thru- His Son Asfaq Qumar S/o Late Mohad Tabaraq Hussain Through His Son Ashfaq Qumar, R/o Mominpara P.S. City Kotwali, Ambikapur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Transport Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. State Transport Authority Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent And REVP No. 38 Of 2015 • Shri Mohammed Kamrujama, (Died) Thru- His Son Ashfaq Qumar S/o Late Mohad Tabaraq Hussain Through His Son Ashfaq Qumar, R/o Mominpara P.S. City Kotwali, Ambikapur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner Vs

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Transport Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. State Transport Authority Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent And REVP No. 39 Of 2015 • Shri Mohammed Kamrujama, (Died) Thru- His Son Ashfaq Qumar S/o Late Mohad Tabaraq Hussain Through His Son Ashfaq Qumar, R/o Mominpara P.S. City Kotwali, Ambikapur, District- Surguja,

Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner Vs

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Transport Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. State Transport Authority Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Petitioners Shri S.K. Bajpai, Advocate For Respondent/State Shri S. Majid Ali, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board By 27/08/2015 I.A. No.2, applications for withdrawal of review petitions are considered and allowed.

Accordingly, the review petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- JUDGE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA Nirala