High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/123/2017disposed off

Kuldeep Singh Chawla v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-01-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra3 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 121 of 2017

1. Satvindar Kour W/o Navneet Singh Aged About 32 Years Proprietor Of R.K. Supplier, Bhandar, R/o House No. 16/627, Tatya Para, Phool Chowk, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through: Collector Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Assistant Labour Commissioner, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Zonal Commissioner, Zone No.7, Municipal Corporation, Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent And WPC No. 120 Of 2017

1. Kuldeep Singh Chawla S/o Trilok Singh Chawla Aged About 64 Years Proprietor Of Adarsh Kiraya Bhandar, R/o House No. 16/627, Tatya Para, Phool Chowk, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner Vs

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Collector, Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Zone Commissioner, Zone No. 7, Municipal Corporation, Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Additional District Magistrate, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent

And WPC No. 123 Of 2017

1. Kuldeep Singh Chawla S/o Trilok Singh Chawla, Aged About 64 Years Proprietor Of Adarsh Kiraya Bhandar, R/o House No. 16/627, Tatya Para, Phool Chowk, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner Vs

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Throgh : The Collector, District Balodabazar Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh).

2. District Education Officer, District Balodabazar Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh).

3. Sub Divisional Officer, P. W. D. Sub Division Balodabazar, District Balodabazar Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh).

---- Respondent For Petitioners Shri N.K. Chhatterjee, Advocate For Respondent/State Shri Shashank Thakur, Govt. Advocate For Respondent/Corpn. Shri H.B. Agrawal, Sr. Adv. with Shri Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 25/01/2017 1.

Petitioners have preferred these writ petitions seeking a direction to the respondents to pay outstanding dues of the petitioners along with interest @ 12%.

Referring to the order passed by this Court in Om Sai Traders & Tent House v. State of Chhattisgarh & others {WPC No.2182/2015} and Om Sai Traders & Tent House v. State of Chhattisgarh & others {WA No.38/2015}, it is argued that the

respondents are obliged in law to make payment of the undisputed amount.

Considering the entire facts situation of the case and the previous orders of this Court, all the writ petitions are disposed of with a direction that in the event the petitioners prefer representation before the concerned Collector for payment of the undisputed amount within a period of one month from today, the said respondent shall consider and decide petitioners' representation for making payment of the undisputed amount by the concerned department at the earliest, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of submission of representation.

Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra Gowri