Pintu v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR M.Cr.C.No.1513 of 2020 Pintu S/o Suresh Yadav, aged about 23 years, resident of Jashpur, PSFatehpur, District-Gaya (Bihar) ---Applicant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, through the Police Station Chauki-Lawan, ThanaKasdol, District Balodabazar Bhatapara (CG) ---Non-Applicant For Applicant :
Ms Anuja Sharma, Advocate For Non-applicant :
Mr.Chandresh Shrivastava, Dy.A.G.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 14/05/2020 1.
The accused/applicant has moved this bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for release him on regular bail during trial in connection with Crime No.01/2020, registered at Police ChaukiLawan, Police Station-Kasdol, Distt.Balodabazar-Bhatapara (CG), for the offence punishable under Section 41(1+4) CrPC and Section 379 of the IPC. 2.
Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the applicant and main accused Sohil Khan have stolen various vehicles including Balero and thereby committed the aforesaid offences.
3.
Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the applicant has not committed any offence and he has falsely been implicated in crime in question. He would further submit that the applicant has been arrested on 2.2.2020 and trial is likely to take time.
4.
On the other hand, learned counsel for the State would oppose the bail application.
5.
I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused
the case diary.
6.
Taking into consideration the facts & circumstances of the case, nature & gravity of offence, pre-trial detention of the applicant and material available in case diary, this Court is of the opinion that present is a fit case, in which, the applicant should be enlarged on regular bail. 7.
Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. is allowed.
8.
It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of ₹ 25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court, for his appearance as and when directed.
9.
It is made clear that if the applicant has already been released on bail pursuant to the bail bonds already furnished in view of the order passed by the High Power Committee constituted in compliance of the order of the Supreme Court of India dated 23.3.2020 in the matter of In Re : Contagion of COVID 19 Virus in Prisons (Suo Motu Writ Petition (C) No.1/2020), he need not furnish bail bonds afresh and the bail bonds already furnished shall be deemed to be the bail bonds furnished in compliance of the order of this Court, but if he has not furnished bail bonds earlier, then he will be required to furnish bail bonds.
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) JUDGE B/-