Kailash Agrawal v. The State Of C.G.And ORS.

1N THE HIGH CGURT OF UDICA URE AT BILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH) gM'w W. P. NG.

GF 2364 PETITEGNER Kailash Agrawal, S/o Late Shri K.

M4 Agrawal, aged about years, R/o Vill.

Juna Lakhanput, Gmm Panchayat- Juna Lakhanpux Tahsil Ambikapur, District t Sutguia [Chhattisgarh]

VERSUS

RESPGNBENTS 1.

State of Chhaitisgath through Secretary, Department of Erxviroument and Urban Administration Manttalaya, Dau Kaiyan Singh Bhawan, Raiput {Chhattigsarh] Secretary, Departmem of Panchayat & Rural Develof,ment, Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raiput [Chhattigsath] Collector, District Surguja Ambikapur {Chhattisgarh} Nagar Painchayat, Lakharipur through Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Lakhanpur, Tah. Ambikapur, Distt.

éurguja [Chhattisgarh} WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA FGR {SSUANCE OF WRIT IN - NATURE OF CERTIORARI MANDJLMUS PROHIBITION ANB GTE-EEK SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS ORDER OR ORDERS:

The petitiofier, above-framed, most respectfully begs to submit as wider: - Aw

11mm WW§3WH .m 201 5%?

mm(m) X " mmwiamm ' mmwm mmféwh ' wmm §saimsné§1 ant Kumar Mishra s.'B. Hon'bie.shri Jusiice Prasr 6.11.201 5 '

Shn Saurabh Sharma Adv ocate for the petmoner Shn Suresh Khakharla & Shrl Arun Sao Dy Advocate Generals '

I for the State Learned counsel for the pe ntloner pleads no mstruchons Smce no other counsel Is appearing to press thus wnt petmon is Court is Ieft with noiother option I nor any representation ismade, but tordismiss the writ petition for ant of prosecution.

Accordingly'

the: writ petition is- .dismissed for Want'

tof.'

a \ w I prosecution.

i Sdl- .

'i PrashantKumar Mlshra '

3i Judge