High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1245/2020dismissed

Ku. Radhika Naidu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-02-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1245 of 2020 • Ku. Radhika Naidu D/o Dalaiya Naidu Aged About 46 Years Posted As Peon, In The Office Of Government Handicapped Children Home, Village Adawal, Tahsil Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Raipur, District Raipur, C.G.

2. Director Office Of Directorate Social Welfare Department, Mahanadi Khand, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur, C.G.

3. Collector (Social Welfare) Jagdalpur, District Bastar C.G.

4. Dy. Director, Social Welfare Department Jagdalpur, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh

5. Superintendent Government Handicapped Children Home, Village Adawal, Tahsil Jagdalpur, District Bastar(C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Lalit Jangde, Advocate For Respondents/State :

Ms. Akanksha Jain, Dy. GA Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 25/02/20

1. Heard.

2. Challenge in this petition is to the order of suspension dated 22.01.2020 passed by the respondent No.3.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has been suspended without giving any opportunity of hearing and the allegations on

which the petitioner has been suspended are false, therefore, the suspension order needs to be revoked.

4. Per contra, learned State counsel opposes the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner.

5. Perusal of the order Annexure P-1 dated 22.01.2020 would show that the serious allegations have been attributed to the petitioner that she being the peon in the Physically handicapped boys hostel, Jagdalpur used to get the household work done from the handicapped children and besides that used to abuse the children and takeaway the food meant for them. The petitioner contends that she is innocent and false allegations have been attributed that can only be gone into during the course of departmental enquiry. At this stage, no finding can be arrived at and nothing has been placed before this Court to show that the suspension is mala fide or out come of any ulterior motive.

6. Under the circumstances, I do not find any reason to interfere with the order of suspension. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Ashu