← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1414/2020disposed off

Sunety Bai Verma v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-08-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1414 of 2020

1. Sunety Bai Verma W/o Late Tijau Verma Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Kanimera, Block- Chhuikhadan, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh

2. Narabdiya W/o Fagguram Sahu Aged About 45 Years R/o Village- Kanimera, Khudimudi, Bolck- Chhuikhadan, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhttisgarh

3. Hemprakash Vaishnav S/o Late Shyamdas Vaishnav Aged About 27 Years R/o Ward No.3, Chhuikhadan, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh

4. Ganga Bai Pal W/o Late Hanshraj Pal Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Kodiya, Tahsil- Khairagarh, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Water Resources Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Executive Engineer Water Resources Department, Chhuikhadan, DistrictRajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Shri Pramod Ramteke, Advocate For Respondents/State :

Ms. Richa Shukla, Dy. GA Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order 06/08/20

1. Heard.

2. The grievance of the petitioners is that the husband of petitioner No.1 Sunety Bai Verma namely Tijau Verma died on 19.09.2017, likewise husband of petitioner No.2 Narabdiya namely Fagguram Sahu died on 27.01.2017, father of petitioner No.3 Hemprakash Vaishnav namely Shyamdas Vaishnav died on

25.01.2007 and the husband of Ganga Bai Pal namely Hanshraj Pal died on 01.01.2017 and all the deceased namely Tijau Verma, Fagguram Sahu, Shyamdas Vaishnav and Hanshraj Pal were working with water resources department as daily wage employees and they died in harness and as per the policy of the State in case of death of daily wage employee, instead of compassionate appointment Rs. 1 Lakh as compassionate amount are to be given the dependents of the deceased employee but the said amount has not been given to the petitioners.

3. It is contended that the petitioners have moved the representations for payment of the compassionate amount but the same remains undecided.

4. Perusal of the documents would show that the petitioners have made different representations for grant of compassionate amount of Rs.1 Lakh on the ground that they are the dependents of the deceased daily wage employees. Under the circumstances, the petitioners are given liberty to make afresh representations before the respondent No.2 within a period of four weeks from today to get the compassionate amount as per the policy of the State and if such representations are filed, the same shall be decided within a further period of 90 days from the date of receipt of the representations according to the policy of the State after verification of the facts.

5. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Ashu