← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCC/590/2013dismissed

M/S Annapurna Malleables Private Limited And ANR. v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

2015-05-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice T. P. Sharma,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Inder Singh Uboweja2 pages

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCC No. 590 of 2013

1. M/S Annapurna Malleables Private Limited, A company incorporated and registered under the relevant priovisions of the Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office and works at 19, New Industrial Area, Sarora, Ring Road No. 2, Raipur (C.G.)

2. Shri Kapiraj Singhania S/o Malooram Singhania, aged About 47 Years, Indian Citizen, Shareholder And Managing Director, M/S Annapurna Malleables having Its Regd. Off. & Works At 19, New Industrial Area, Sarora, Ring Road No. 2, Raipur C.G. ---- Applicants

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh (a) Through The Principal Secretary, Deptt. Of Commerce And Industries, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur C.G. (b) Through The Principal Secretary, Deptt. Of Commercial Tax DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur C.G.

2. The Principal Secretary to The Govt. Of C.G., Deptt. Of Commerce And Industries, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur C.G. ---- Respondents For Applicants. - Mr. Varun Sharma, counsel.

For Respondents. - Mr. Roshan Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the State. Hon'ble Shri Justice T. P. Sharma Hon'ble Shri Justice Inder Singh Uboweja Order On Board (01/05/2015) Per T.P. Sharma, J.

1.

This is application for restoration of W.P.No.1864/2005, dismissed for non compliance of order dated 03.12.2009. 2.

Present application has been filed after 60 days of its limitation. 3.

I.A.No.02/2015, for condonation of delay in filing the application perused. Original petition also perused.

4.

Sufficient time for making good the defaults has been provided to the applicant, but the applicant has neither removed the defaults nor prayed for extension. Even after lapse of period for removal of

defaults, petitioner has failed to remove defaults and has filed this application (MCC) only after receiving the order dated 03.02.2010. 5.

Considering the aforesaid facts, we do not find any ground for condonation of delay in filing the application and also for restoration of writ petition.

6.

Consequently, I.A.No.02/2015 is dismissed. Consequent thereto, restoration application also stands dismissed reserving liberty to the applicants to file afresh, if cause survives. No order as to cost. J U D G E J U D G E Vijay