A. S. Fertilizer v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT of CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 1369 of 2021 • A.S. Fertilizer through: Proprietor Ajay Kumar Joshi, S/o late K.P. Joshi, aged about 48 years, office at-12 First Floor Durga College Complex, K.K. Road, Moudhapara, Raipur, Civil and Revenue District Raipur C.G. ------Petitioner

VERSUS

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of Agriculture Development, Mahanadi Bhavan P.S. Rakhi, Naya Raipur, Civil and Revenue District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Managing Direction, C.G. Rajya Beej Evam Krishi Vikas Nigam Limited, Beej Bhavan Ravigram, Telibandha, Raipur, Civil and Revenue District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Additional Direction, Agriculture (Fertilizer), Directorate Agriculture, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh -------Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Mayank Chandrakar, Advocate. For Respondent 2 : Mr. Palash Tiwari, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. Siddarth Dubey, Dy. Govt. Adv. Hon'ble Shri P.R. Ramachandra Menon, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board Per P.R. Ramachandra Menon, CJ.

08/03/2021 1.

The petitioner has moved this Court with the following prayers. "10. 1 To call for the records of the case for the kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court.

10.2 To issue an appropriate writ or order or direct the Respondent no. 2 to implead the word 'Importer' in the eligibility clause of Rate Contract Offer (E-bidding) Document for Supplying of Agricultural Micronutrients for the year of 2021-22 in the State of Chhattisgarh 10.3 To issue an appropriate writ or order and direct the Respondent no. 2 to consider the candidature/ bid of the petitioner after impleading the word 'Importer' in the eligibility clause of Rate Contract Offer (E-bidding) Document for Supplying of Agricultural Micronutrients for the year of 2021-22.

10.4 To issue an appropriate writ or order and direct the Respondent No. 2 to consider the representation of the petitioner before last date of filing the bid/RCO ie. 04.03.2021.

10.5 Any other relief deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be granted."

2.

When the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent developments whereby the tender has been cancelled, for floating fresh tender, the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the matter.

3.

Permission is granted.

4.

Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/- Sd/- (P.R. Ramachandra Menon) (Parth Prateem Sahu) Chief Justice Judge Pawan