High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCRCA/336/2020allowed

Gaurav Sinha v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-06-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra3 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRCA No. 336 of 2020

1. Gaurav Sinha S/o Shyam Murari Sinha Aged About 34 Years R/o Village Sadakpersuli, Police Station And District Gariaband, Chhattisgarh, District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh ---- Applicant

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Gariaband, District Gariaband, Chhattisgarh, District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent MCRCA No. 354 of 2020

1. Bhuvan Lal Sinha S/o Shri Ishwari Lal Sinha Aged About 57 Years R/o Village Sadak Parsuli, Gariaband, Police Station Gariaband, District Gariaband Chhattisgarh., District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh ---- Applicant

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Gariaband , District Gariaband Chhattisgarh., District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent MCRCA No. 355 of 2020

1. Kamal Sahu S/o Shri Bihari Lal Sahu Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Hardi , Gariaband, Police Station Gariaband , District Gariaband Chhattisgarh., District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh ---- Applicant

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station, Gariaband, District Gariaband Chhattisgarh., District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent

For respective Mr. Y.C. Sharma & Shri Kshitij Sharma, Applicants Advocates For Respondent /State Mr. Vikram Sharma, Dy. Govt. Advocate Proceedings through Video Conferencing Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 24/6/2020

1. Since all the applications arising out of same crime number i.e. Cr. No.35/2020 they are being considered and decided by this common order.

2. The applicants have preferred these applications for grant of anticipatory bail, as they apprehend their arrest in connection with Crime No.35/2020 registered at Police Station Gariaband, District Gariyaband, for offence punishable under Section 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Applicants allegedly sold paddy showing same to be the yielded from their agricultural land whereas, in fact, they were growing vegetables and not paddy in their agricultural field.

4. Learned State Counsel would oppose the prayer for grant of bail.

5. Considering the entire facts situation of the case, this Court is inclined to release the applicants on anticipatory bail.

6. Accordingly, all the applications are allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of the applicants, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on each of them executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the arresting officer with the following conditions:-

(a) they shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(b) they shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer.

Sd/- (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Judge Gowri