Mayank Kumar Nagendra v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR M.Cr.C.No.1595 of 2020 Mayank Kumar Nagendra S/o Late Domansingh Nagendra, aged about 20 years, R/o. I Pocket Maroda Sector Bhilai, Tehsil and District Durg (CG) ---Applicant

Versus

State of Chhattisgarh Through S.H.O. P.S. Bhilai Nagar, District Durg (CG) ---Non-Applicant For Applicant :

Mr.Avinash Chand Sahu, Advocate For Non-applicant :

Mr.Alok Bakshi, Addl. Advocate General Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 15/05/2020 1.

The accused/applicant has moved this bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for release him on regular bail during trial in connection with Crime No.475/2019, registered at Police Station-Bhilai Nagar, Distt.Durg (CG), for the offence punishable under Section 307 of the IPC and Sections 25 & 27 of the Arms Act. 2.

Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the applicant assaulted the complainant by knife and caused grievous injuries, which were sufficient to cause his death and possessed the said arm without authority of law. 3.

Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the applicant has not committed any offence and he has falsely been implicated in crime in question. He would further submit that there is no intention to cause death of the complainant, the applicant has been arrested on 10.12.2019 and chargesheet has been filed. 4.

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State would oppose the bail application.

5.

I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the case diary.

6.

Taking into consideration the facts & circumstances of the case, nature & gravity of offence, pre-trial detention of the applicant and nature of injuries, this Court is of the opinion that present is a fit case, in which, the applicant should be enlarged on regular bail. 7.

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. is allowed.

8.

It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of ₹ 25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court, for his appearance as and when directed.

9.

It is made clear that if the applicant has already been released on bail pursuant to the bail bonds already furnished in view of the order passed by the High Power Committee constituted in compliance of the order of the Supreme Court of India dated 23.3.2020 in the matter of In Re : Contagion of COVID 19 Virus in Prisons (Suo Motu Writ Petition (C) No.1/2020), he need not furnish bail bonds afresh and the bail bonds already furnished shall be deemed to be the bail bonds furnished in compliance of the order of this Court, but if he has not furnished bail bonds earlier, then he will be required to furnish bail bonds.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) JUDGE B/-