Har Prasad Laxme v. Shri B.L.Agrawal And ANR.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR

Contemot Case (C.l No. '36-L 72013 iy*-* APPLICANT:

Har Prasad Laxme, son of late Jogiram Laxme, aged about 64 ye^a's, R/o.

Block Road ^yTakhatpur, P.S.

& Tahsil a^^ Takhatpur, CivU and Revenue District Bilaspur (C.G.)

VERSUS

NON-APPLICAN<FS Shn B.L. Agrawal, Secretary, Secretary, Revenue Departinent, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur (C.G.), Shri Rajat Kuinar, CoUector Korba, District Korba (C.G.), W.P.fS).N0.2093/2012 fHar Prasad Laxme Vs. State ofC.G. SB anotherj CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER SECTION 11 & 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT. 1971, READ WITH ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

3%9 -yiyMy, yTfl'ti'i^, Ripiwi^;

/ • .

•mwn ^w^.A^^W^^.3<^.^NF^ 201J ^ ; y^y ysi* (ij^^g) .;

^ ^ .

:

;;

qirafeiitemngtft'fetS^EOTi ^isiRww^i .

aiSg'^iR-ii'* (iWyi^itiKW S.B: HON'BLE SHRt JUSTIC6 SANJAY K. AGRAWAL 05.05.2015 Mr. J.K. Shastri, counseli Mr. Vipin Tiwari, counsel forthe applicant.

for the non-applicants.

Heard.

Counsel for the non-a(?pl lcants submit the order complained of ^•y:^ has been complied wgfa sljbstahtially.

In view of the submis thenon-applicants the conter ^ion made by learned counsel for [pt petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

Accordingly, the conterfipt proceeding is dropped against respondents. Rule issuedis dis|;harged. 'Sd/- SanjayK.^rawal Judge ^- vfg€»yvw, ws- .Fs/.!,33/2pi^-2ji,i),og(i., '